What Are AFFF Lawsuits?

AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) lawsuits are legal claims filed against manufacturers of firefighting foams containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These specialized foams have been widely used by firefighters, military personnel, and at airports since the 1970s due to their effectiveness in suppressing fuel-based fires.

These legal actions allege that manufacturers knew or should have known about the potential health risks associated with PFAS chemicals but failed to warn users or the public. The lawsuits seek compensation for individuals who developed serious health conditions after exposure to these chemicals, including various forms of cancer, liver damage, thyroid disease, and other serious medical conditions.

Who Can File an AFFF Lawsuit?

Multiple groups may qualify to pursue legal action related to AFFF exposure. Firefighters who used the foam regularly during training exercises or emergency responses form a significant portion of claimants. Military personnel stationed at bases where AFFF was routinely used in training or emergency situations may also have claims.

Additionally, individuals living near military bases, airports, or industrial facilities where AFFF was regularly used may qualify if they can demonstrate exposure through contaminated drinking water or soil. The key factors in determining eligibility include documented exposure to AFFF and a diagnosis of a condition linked to PFAS exposure, such as kidney cancer, testicular cancer, pancreatic cancer, or other serious health issues.

Attorney Options for AFFF Cases

When seeking legal representation for an AFFF lawsuit, several types of attorneys and law firms specialize in these complex cases. Motley Rice has established itself as a leader in environmental litigation, including PFAS cases. Their team brings extensive experience in multidistrict litigation and class action lawsuits.

Weitz & Luxenberg offers specialized knowledge in toxic exposure cases and has a dedicated team for AFFF litigation. Their attorneys work with scientific experts to establish causation between exposure and illness. For those seeking firms with national reach, Napoli Shkolnik has offices across the country and significant experience with AFFF cases, particularly those involving contaminated water supplies.

When selecting an attorney, consider their experience with PFAS litigation specifically, their resources to handle complex scientific evidence, and their track record of settlements or verdicts in similar cases. Most AFFF attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning they only collect payment if they secure compensation for you.

The Legal Process for AFFF Claims

The AFFF lawsuit process typically begins with a case evaluation where an attorney reviews your exposure history and medical records. If they determine you have a valid claim, they will file a complaint against the responsible manufacturers, potentially including companies like 3M, DuPont, or Chemours.

Many AFFF cases have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the District of South Carolina. This consolidation streamlines pretrial proceedings while allowing each case to maintain its individual characteristics. The discovery phase involves gathering evidence, including internal company documents, scientific studies, and expert testimony.

Settlement negotiations often occur before trial, with some manufacturers already proposing settlement frameworks. For instance, Tyco and its parent company Johnson Controls have engaged in settlement discussions. If a settlement isn't reached, individual cases may proceed to trial, where compensation is determined based on factors like exposure level, severity of illness, and evidence of manufacturer knowledge of risks.

Compensation and Timeline Considerations

Compensation in AFFF lawsuits may include medical expenses (past and future), lost wages, diminished earning capacity, pain and suffering, and in some cases, punitive damages. The specific amount varies significantly based on individual circumstances, with more severe health conditions typically resulting in higher compensation amounts.

The timeline for AFFF litigation varies considerably. While some cases reach settlement within 1-3 years, complex cases can take longer, especially if they proceed to trial. The MDL process aims to expedite proceedings, but with thousands of cases pending, individual resolution timelines differ.

Statute of limitations considerations are crucial, as they vary by state and typically range from 1-6 years from discovery of the injury. Working with firms like Baron & Budd or Levin Papantonio can help ensure timely filing and proper documentation of claims.

Conclusion

AFFF lawsuits represent an important avenue for those affected by PFAS exposure to seek justice and compensation. As the scientific evidence linking these chemicals to serious health conditions continues to grow, the legal landscape evolves accordingly. If you believe you may have been exposed to AFFF and are experiencing health issues, consulting with a qualified attorney who specializes in these cases is a critical first step. They can evaluate your specific situation, explain the potential compensation options, and guide you through the complex litigation process. While no legal action can fully address the health impacts of PFAS exposure, successful claims can provide financial resources for medical care and acknowledge the responsibility of manufacturers who produced these harmful substances.

Citations

This content was written by AI and reviewed by a human for quality and compliance.